Now back to reality, LLMs are never that good, they're never near that hypothetical "I'm feeling lucky", and this has to do with how they're fundamentally designed, I never so far asked GPT about something that I'm specialized at, and it gave me a sufficient answer that I would expect from someone who is as much as expert as me in that given field. People tend to think that GPT (and other LLMs) is doing so well, but only when it comes to things that they themselves do not understand that well (Gell-Mann Amnesia2), even when it sounds confident, it may be approximating, averaging, exaggerate (Peters 2025) or confidently (Sun 2025) reproducing a mistake. There is no guarantee whatsoever that the answer it gives is the best one, the contested one, or even a correct one, only that it is a plausible one. And that distinction matters, because intellect isn’t built on plausibility but on understanding why something might be wrong, who disagrees with it, what assumptions are being smuggled in, and what breaks when those assumptions fail
Ранее жителю Ухты дали шесть лет за публикацию материала об украинских террористах.
，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
Российский лидер Владимир Путин второй раз за неделю поговорил с президентом Ирана Масудом Пезешкианом. Об этом говорится в заявлении на сайте Кремля.
«Что касается формата, то да, речь идет о продолжении трехстороннего формата», — сказал представитель Кремля.。PDF资料对此有专业解读
Жители Кубы вышли на ночные протесты с кастрюлями01:06
Document Intelligence (RAG)，这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述