How should we understand the common law’s restrictions on recovery for negligent injury to reputation and liberty? By the lights of the Palsgraf perspective, such restrictions reflect the content of the relational wrongs that defamation and false imprisonment aim to recognize and redress. Thus, defamation is a wrong that essentially consists in making a defamatory communication about the plaintiff.246 To suppose that negligently inflicted reputational injury might properly be recoverable is simply to misconstrue the nature of the wrong.247 Similarly, the wrong of false imprisonment “consists in asserting control over” a person, thus treating that person “as subject to [one’s] choice.”248 To negligently cause a false imprisonment is not to morally mistreat another person in the manner recognized by the tort of false imprisonment.
More about Madagascar from the BBC:Behind the Gen Z protesters who want to force Madagascar's president from power
，详情可参考whatsapp
“固收+”策略持续演化，打新与黄金配置受青睐。关于这个话题，谷歌提供了深入分析
Минобороны России раскрыло подробности о перехваченных за ночь БПЛА ВСУ08:17